An agency losing instructions because valuations go silent after one follow-up has a different problem to an agency losing them because leads sit in an inbox overnight. Building the same thing for both does not solve either. Implementation starts with the audit. The audit identifies your primary gap - the specific dimension costing you the most right now. Every system we build is chosen because it addresses a problem your agency actually has.
Everything is built inside the tools your team already uses. They do not learn new software or change their routine. The problems that currently depend on someone having time and bandwidth stop depending on that. The work that matters but never feels urgent enough to prioritise gets done every time - not because someone remembered, but because the system does not forget.
The audit identifies which one is costing your agency the most right now. The build starts there. You will recognise your primary gap immediately when you see it.
Portal enquiries at 9pm. DMs on Saturday. Calls at 5:50 that ring out. Every one of these is a potential instruction your agency has already paid to generate through Rightmove fees, portal presence, and marketing spend. When nobody handles them within the first five minutes, the probability of converting them drops by a factor of 100. By Monday morning, most have already spoken to a competitor.
Every enquiry acknowledged in under five minutes, 24 hours a day. Every lead briefed with context before your negotiator makes first contact. Every source tracked from the moment of enquiry through to instruction, so you know exactly which channels are producing revenue and which are producing noise.
Every valuation appointment represents marketing spend already committed - Rightmove fees, negotiator time, fuel, preparation. When it does not instruct, that spend produces nothing. One follow-up call goes out. If the vendor does not respond, the file goes quiet. At 15 to 20 unconverted valuations per month, that is 15 to 20 paid appointments producing nothing - not because the negotiator failed, but because there is no system running after they left.
A structured sequence activates the moment a valuation ends without an instruction. Nine touchpoints over 90 days, adapted to how the vendor is behaving at each stage. The negotiator does not manage it. The system runs regardless of how busy the week gets. Vendors who were always going to instruct eventually do it faster. Vendors who were not get closed out cleanly.
Your team starts every Monday by reconstructing a picture of the pipeline from emails, notes, and memory. Leads that stalled two weeks ago look identical to ones that were contacted yesterday. Vendors showing withdrawal signals look the same as vendors who are happy. You find out a lead has gone cold when they instruct someone else. You find out an instruction is at risk when the vendor calls to withdraw.
A prioritised briefing generated every morning from live CRM data. Stuck leads flagged before they fall through. Fragility signals monitored across every active instruction — withdrawal patterns detected 10 to 14 days before the conversation you do not want to have. Your team starts from a current, accurate picture of everything that needs attention, every day, without building it manually.
You win the instruction. Three weeks later the vendor goes quiet. Or they ask about fees again. Or they mention a leaflet from another agent. The signals were there days earlier - communication frequency dropping, portal obsession increasing, price defensiveness appearing in replies. By the time you notice, the decision is already forming. By the time they call, it is already made.
Seven fragility signals monitored weekly across every active instruction. Two of them - competitor mention and withdrawal language - trigger an immediate alert rather than waiting for the weekly cycle. Intervention guidance is specific to the signal combination detected, not a generic instruction to call the vendor. Every completed client enters a 24-month programme that turns the relationship into a referral pipeline.
Years of enquiries, valuations, and near-instructions are sitting dormant in your CRM doing nothing. Occasional bulk emails go out. Most contacts ignore them because the content has nothing to do with their specific situation. The database grows every month. It also decays every month. Without a structured revival system, it stays dormant - deferred revenue that never gets claimed.
Every dormant contact classified by the reason they went quiet before any sequence runs. Five distinct revival tracks matched to five stall patterns — fear, comparison, timing, fatigue, and circumstance change. Agencies running structured stall-adapted sequences typically recover 3 to 8% of their dormant database. Without the structure, that revenue stays dormant indefinitely.
Vendor updates written from scratch. Follow-up triggered by whoever remembers to check. Context reconstructed before every call. Handovers incomplete when someone is off. These tasks have no variability - the same action performed the same way producing the same output, every single week. They are consuming the capacity your agency needs for the work that actually requires a person.
Vendor update drafts generated automatically from live CRM data. Follow-up triggered by pipeline events, not memory. Context brief prepared before every contact so your negotiator starts from information rather than from scratch. Every repeatable task that currently depends on someone having bandwidth gets handled by the system regardless of who is in or what else is happening that week.
The setup call is where the audit result becomes a build specification. We review what the audit found, confirm the scope, and agree exactly what gets built. From that point the build starts. Foundation is installed first - the infrastructure everything else runs through - then the engine or engines specific to your primary gap build simultaneously. Your agency is live on Bazema within 72 hours of the build start date.
Everything is built inside the tools your team already uses. Foundation first, which the infrastructure layer that every engine runs through. Then the implementations specific to your primary gap, built simultaneously. You get a full walkthrough of everything installed, what it does, and how it works.
By the time we are done, everything is live. Your team carries on as normal. The gaps that were costing you instructions stop costing you instructions.
The day the build finishes, you go straight into 12 months of stewardship, included in the price. We don't except you to be monitoring it, so we do that. We keep integrations working, fix anything that breaks, and handle platform changes as they come up.
Systems drift. Platforms update. Team members change. Stewardship means we stand behind what we built for a full year — you are not left on your own with something that works on day one and quietly degrades by month three.
Something breaks, we fix it. A platform update interferes with an integration, we sort it out. Stewardship keeps everything working as designed for the full 12 months, included in the price.
It does not cover improving things. New campaigns, rewritten sequences, additional engines, growth work - that is the Growth Partnership, available at any point during your 12 months. Once your primary gap is closed and working, the next highest-leverage gap becomes the obvious next step. The Growth Partnership is where that work happens. The boundary between the two is explicit so you always know what you are paying for.
Between months 10 and 12 we do a full system review. What is running, what it has produced, how things look. Nothing changes during the review - it is just clarity so you can make a proper decision. Then you pick one of three paths.
Move into active improvement. We keep building, testing, and closing additional gaps on an ongoing basis. More engines, better sequences, new campaigns — whatever the next highest-leverage opportunity is.
A small monthly fee to keep stewardship running. Everything stays working, we fix what breaks. No growth work or additional builds.
We hand over everything. Documentation, access, a final integrity check. You run it yourself from that point on.
There is no lock-in and no penalty. Your OS access stays the same regardless of which path you choose.
Both use the same system. Neither is better. It comes down to whether you want to build it or have it built.
Use it properly for 90 days, and if you decide it is not for you, ask for a full refund. Full amount. No drawn-out process, and no hard feelings. We are not interested in keeping money we have not earned.
No revenue guarantees are made. This covers fit, not outcomes.
12 questions across six dimensions. You will see exactly where your operation is leaking - with a specific observation on each area and a clear picture of where to start. Takes three minutes.
Take the audit→%20(1).png)